Legal Opinion

United States v. Heraeus-Amersil, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 18, 1982No. Appeal No. 81-19PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge:

This is an appeal from a decision of the United States Court of International Trade1 dealing with the question of when increased duties determined on liquidation must be paid to the United States Customs Service. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

At issue is the payment of increased duties on six entries of precious metal wire imported by appellee. Appellant contends that the increased duties were due, in accordance with Customs Regulations,2 upon receipt by appellee of the bills for duty for each entry.3 When appellee refused to pay, and instead filed a protest of the classification of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Central Commodities Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Department of Army v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. In re N.C. TradingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. FLAGSTAFF LIQUOR COMPANY v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Syva Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  3. Kalan, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. A Classic Time v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API