Legal Opinion

A Classic Time v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 2, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-161. Court Nos. 90-09-00467, 90-09-00468, 90-10-00518, 90-10-00519, 90-10-00520, 90-10-00521, 90-10-00522 and 90-10-00523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AQUILINO, Judge:

The defendant has interposed a motion to dismiss the above-encaptioned actions for failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted.

I

The complaints are essentially the same. Each alleges that the plaintiff named therein was an importer of electrical timepieces of the kinds at issue in Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 1 CIT 236, 518 F.Supp. 1341 (1981), aff'd, 69 CCPA 136, 673 F.2d 1375 (1982), or Belfont Sales Corp. v. United States, 11 CIT 541, 666 F.Supp. 1568 (1987), reh’g denied, 12 CIT 916, 698 F.Supp. 916 (1988), aff'd, 878 F.2d 1413 (Fed.Cir.1989). Each…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API