Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 18, 1997No. Court No. 96-04-01078PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on a motion for judgment on the agency record by plaintiff Wheatland Tube Company (“Wheatland”). Wheatland seeks a remand to the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) with instructions to (1) perform an anticircumvention analysis or provide legally sufficient reasons for failing to perform such an analysis, (2) determine that the scope of the stan*809dard pipe orders as evaluated under 19 C.F.R. § 353.29(i)(l) is not dispositively resolved with respect to the pipe at issue, and (3) conduct a scope inquiry pursuant to 19 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
  5. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tak Fat Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Rhodia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  3. U.S. Steel Group-A Unit of USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  4. Wirth Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. Deacero S.A. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API