Legal Opinion
In re N.C. Trading
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 26, 1978No. 78-10PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MilleR, Judge.
This appeal is from the order of the U.S. Customs Court denying a motion by N. C. Trading Co., Inc.1 (“N. C. Trading”) to intervene in Aireo, Inc. v. United States, Customs Court No. 76-3-00643. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Aireo, Inc. (“Aireo”), an American manufacturer of ferrochrome, brought suit in the Customs Court under section 516(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 USC 1516(d)),2 challenging a determination by the Secretary of the Treasury (“Secretary”) that bounties or grants are not being bestowed on ferrochrome imported from the Republic of South Africa within the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Protection, Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Heraeus-Amersil, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.