Legal Opinion
Fayer v. Vaughn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2011No. 10-15520PublishedCited by 339 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Alex Fayer’s amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) § 205.465 makes it “unlawful for a person to possess ... any document or personal identifying information for the purpose of establishing a false status ... or identity.” Fayer admitted to Agent Arthur Vaughn of the Nevada Gaming Control Board (“NGCB”) that he possessed and used an unofficial identification card and credit card in the name of “James McLynn” to gamble at several Las Vegas casinos. Fayer’s admissions provided Vaughn…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by339 opinions
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Sarmad Syed v. M-I, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Alta Devices, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.