State v. Roberts
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMART, Judge.
This appeal is before us as an interlocutory appeal by the State of the granting of a motion to suppress evidence. The State takes this appeal pursuant to § 547.200.1(2), RSMo 1994 1 , which provides that an appeal may be taken by the State “from any order or judgment the substantive effect of which results in ... suppressing evidence.”
Matthew J. Roberts is charged with one count of felony animal abuse, § 578.012, and, in the alternative, with one count of misdemeanor animal abuse, § 578.012. At the conclusion of a pretrial hearing on Roberts’ motion to suppress, the trial court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- United States v. Phillip LauterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SchafferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. WoolfolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Commonwealth v. CrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- State v. KrileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.