Legal Opinion
State v. Schaffer
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1999No. 24375PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Thomas E. Schaffer challenges a district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Because we conclude that the suppression motion should have been granted, we reverse.
I
BACKGROUND
Agent Lusk of the Idaho Department of Law Enforcement was told by an informant that three men were manufacturing methamphetamine in Nampa. One of the men named by the informant was subsequently arrested in Owyhee County in connection with the discovery of a methamphetamine lab. This person informed Lusk that two other men, Ivan and Tom, were manufacturing methamphetamine at a specific…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. FleenorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lint v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.