Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Booth v. Sims

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1995No. 22464Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MILLER, Retired Justice,

dissenting and concurring:1

(Filed Dec. 20, 1994.)

I cannot understand why the majority fails to follow our major pension cases that have been unanimously decided over the past fifteen years. They represent the majority view elsewhere. To abandon their teaching for the nebulous concepts contained in the majority opinion does nothing but confuse our pension law and invite unnecessary litigation.

We recognized the contractual nature of public employee pension rights in our earlier case of Wagoner v. Gainer, 167 W.Va. 139, 279 S.E.2d 636 (1981). There, the Legislature had…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Waite v. Civil Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API