Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Weissburg & Aronson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1999No. B117061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiffs Joseph A. Saunders and Joseph A. Saunders, P.C. (Saunders) appeal the judgment entered following the grant of summary judgment in favor of Weissburg & Aronson (Weissburg), County of Los Angeles (County), and two hospitals. We affirm the judgment.

Facts

Pursuant to a written agreement, Saunders and Weissburg jointly represented a large group of hospitals in contingency fee litigation against the Medicare program. That litigation is referred to by the parties as “the Group Appeal.” The Group Appeal was ultimately settled by the unanimous vote of its nine member…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Held v. ArantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Pollack v. LytleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLPSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Navarro v. IHOP PROPERTIES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Olsen v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API