Legal Opinion

Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 22, 2007No. 2006-CC-1774PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

950 So.2d 641 (2007)

William J. SCHEFFLER, III

v.

ADAMS AND REESE, LLP, et al.

No. 2006-CC-1774.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 22, 2007.

Montgomery, Barnett, Brown, Read, Hammond & Mintz, Daniel Lund, New Orleans, Jason A. Cavignac, for Applicant.

David Colvin & Associates, David Lawrence Colvin, Connie Phuong Trieu, Gretna, Lewis Scott Joanen, for Respondent.

WEIMER, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether two attorneys, separately engaged by a client to work as co-counsel on litigation, owe fiduciary duties to each other. Concomitantly, we must also determine whether a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Penalber v. BlountSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Fink v. BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  5. Ramey v. DeCaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of MarksvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  4. Bogues v. Louisiana Energy Consultants, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Bartle v. BerryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API