Legal Opinion

Wimer v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1892PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Josephine county, L. R. Webster, Judge. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage, executed and delivered to plaintiffs by the defendant Anna F. Smith through the defendant W. I. Wadleigh, her duly authorized attorney m fact, conditioned for the payment of six promissory notes of the same date, and described in the complaint; and also for the payment of reasonable attorney fees. It is alleged that these notes were executed and delivered to the plaintiffs as aforesaid for the payment of thirty-eight thousand one hundred and sixty-eight dollars and ten cents, the same being the amount of a balance due and unpaid by the defendant Anna F…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. MoonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. Juzan v. ToulminSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Baldwin v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Seward v. GarlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  5. Stitt v. CassNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. ScribnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bank of Jordan Valley v. DuncanOregon Supreme Court · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API