Legal Opinion

Marriage of Neary v. Neary

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1985No. C4-84-2116PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Cheryl Neary appeals an order denying her motion for an increase in child support. Respondent appeals an order denying his motion for a decrease in child support. The trial court found that a $5,000 increase in respondent’s income does not represent a substantial increase in his earnings; therefore, it denied modification of child support. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Cheryl and Thomas Neary were divorced in 1973. Ramsey County Court awarded custody of their two minor children, then ages two and three, to Cheryl. Thomas paid child support. In 1979, Cheryl moved for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Marriage of Kluge v. KlugeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quaderer v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Landa v. LandaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Maxson v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Meleen v. MeleenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API