Coady v. Jurek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
In a child support order, the trial court found that appellant earned the equivalent of $2,000 net income per month and ordered him to pay, in accordance with the guidelines, $600 per month child support. Appellant brought this appeal. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
Appellant Aime (“Bill”) L. Coady and respondent Jeannine Mary Jurek, who are not married, had two children, Jeannine Aime ViRay, born October 15, 1976, and Alexis Aplonia ViRay, born March 25, 1979. Appellant commenced an action to determine his parentage on June 6, 1983. He was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Marriage of Gummow v. GummowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Lappi v. LappiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Marriage of Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hess v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Graeber v. GraeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Dominium Mgmt. Servs. LLC v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019