Legal Opinion

Berry v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment for personal injuries against defendant Coffman, who is not a party on appeal. She then brought this proceeding against Coffman’s liability insurance carriers. In a trial without a jury the court held for the defendants upon the ground that Coffman had breached the provision of the policy requiring him to cooperate with the insurers, including the duty to attend trial and give evidence, and, therefore, the insurers were relieved of their obligation. Plaintiff appeals.

Coffman had been informed of the trial date, had agreed to appear and did not appear. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Johnson v. DoughtyOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Rosalez v. Unigard InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Charter Oak Fire Insurance v. Interstate Mechanical, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  4. Simonds Ex Rel. Hornig v. BoutonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Canal Insurance Company v. Atlantis Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API