Foxworthy v. City of Hastings
Nebraska Supreme Court
• Error to the district court for Adams county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. cited: Rlattsmouth v. Mitchell, 20 Neb., 232. Tuck v. Ripon, 52 Wis., 200. Oliver v. Oity, 69 Mo., 83. Weave v. Fielding, 110 Mass., 336. Fifth instruction: Baltimore v. Marriott, 9 Md., 174. Nebraska Oity v. Rathbone, 20 Neb., 292. Negligence: Railroad v. Goodman, 15 Wall., 401. Lincoln v. Walker, 18 Neb., 247. cited: Rlattsmouth v. Mitchell, 20 Neb., 228.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant for injuries received by him from a fall, alleged to have been caused by the accumulation of snow and ice on a sidewalk of said city, on the night of the 21st of January, 1886. The answer is, in effect, a general denial. On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the action was dismissed.
The testimony tends to show that the plaintiff was a non-resident of Hastings, and arrived there on the night of the 21st of January, 1886, and rode from the depot to the Lepin Hotel. Soon after arriving…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Gohman v. City of St. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Chadron v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.