Legal Opinion

Henry v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1913No. 17,067PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

From a judgment of the district court for Lancaster county, sustaining a general demurrer to his petition and dismissing his action, plaintiff appeals.

The petition alleges that the defendant is a city of the first class, and at the times set out owned and operated a system of waterworks by and through which it furnished water to its inhabitants for a compensation; that as a part of its water system it maintained station houses, wells, pumps, and other machinery, and employed a large number of servants and employees; that a part of the machinery and pumps used were operated and propelled by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Walters v. City of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Relyea v. Tomahawk Paper & Pulp Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. City of New Orleans v. KerrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Borski v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Frasch v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Nelson-Johnston & Doudna v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API