Legal Opinion
Rathkopf v. Walker
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColden, J.
The plaintiff in a libel action moves for an “ order pursuant to Buie 109, Subdivision 6 of the Buies of Civil Practice, striking out of the answer interposed herein by defendant, William S. Walker, Fred DeFau, Mortimer Tischler and Peter J. McCall, all of the allegations contained in the First Separate Defense, Second Separate Defense, Third Separate Defense and Fourth Separate Defense, upon the ground that each of said defenses consisting of new matter, is insufficient in law, as more particularly set forth in the Memorandum heretofore served upon you * * V*
*170The defendants contend that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sydney v. MacFadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Hamilton v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Kimmerle v. New York Evening Journal, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Campbell v. New York Evening Post, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. BrautigamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Hevey v. News-Journal CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Dyer v. MacDougallDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950