People v. Kieser
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We agree with that Court’s conclusion that under the circumstances of this case, the failure of defendant’s counsel, who at the time of defendant’s trial was an attorney in good standing and duly licensed to practice law in New Jersey, to secure admission pro hac vice to practice in New York, did not aifect his professional qualifications or competence such as to deprive defendant of his right to counsel under the Federal and New York State Constitutions. Nor did counsel’s temporary suspension to practice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- People v. CornwallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- People v. Chin Min FooNew York Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sitcov v. District of Columbia BarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. HoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.