Legal Opinion

In re Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1912PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Charges by the Association of the Bar of the City of Hew York against the respondent of professional misconduct.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, P. J.:

The respondent is charged with misconduct in participating in and authorizing the payment of sums of money by the Metropolitan Street Railroad Company to employees who were called detectives or investigators in relation to litigation before the courts wherein the railroad company was defendant. The charges were referred to a referee who, after a most careful and impartial investigation, has reported to the court that the charges were to a large extent sustained by the evidence, and the matter is now before us for final disposition.

The Metropolitan Street Railroad Company…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HardenbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. In re SchapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. In re BolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wirth v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1993
  3. Golden Door Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters Non-Marine Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
  4. Wagner v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API