Legal Opinion

In re Hardenbrook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York to disbar an attorney.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York presented charges against the respondent, to which the respondent interposed an answer; the case was referred to a referee, and upon his report the matter is brought on before tlie court for such action as it should deem just and proper. The evidence in relation to the charges was fully gone into before the referee, who has given it as his opinion that at the end of the first day’s trial ■ of the case, to which attention will be called, the respondent knew that Mrs. Wood, whom he represented as counsel, had given false testimony…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bobby Jean McKissick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. CrarySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Kane v. RudichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. In re CassidyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. In re RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API