Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield Lake

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. 93-904PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of mandamus to issue, the Levin Group must prove that it is entitled to the performance of a clear legal duty and that it has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Taxation v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 134, 136-137, 616 N.E.2d 869, 871.

A writ of procedendo is “ ‘an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to one of inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment,’ ” but one that never attempts to control how the inferior court rules. State ex rel. Utley v. Abruzzo (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 203, 204, 17 OBR…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fant v. SykesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Masheter v. BoehmOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State ex rel. Ruessman v. FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Utley v. AbruzzoOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Coles v. GranvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API