Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ekern v. Dammann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The first question involved is whether the petition discloses a justiciable controversy. It is the rule, too well established to warrant extended discussion, that this court will not entertain an action for declaratory relief in the absence of a genuine controversy. Heller v. Shapiro, 208 *398Wis. 310, 242 N. W. 174; Village of Sun Prairie v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. 213 Wis. 277, 251 N. W. 605; Petition of Breidenbach, 214 Wis. 54, 252 N. W. 366. The question in this case is whether the action for declaratory relief is not premature. Since the secretary of state has been asked to perform no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Petition of BreidenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Healey v. WipfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Oaks v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Recall Bennett Committee v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. In re HeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wisconsin Justice Initiative, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API