Maxey and Warner v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Logan
— Affirming.
The appellants, are young men convicted in the Laurel circuit court on the charge of robbery. In the brief filed in their behalf they nrged that they did not have-a fair trial. They rely on two grounds: (1) that the court erred in the admission and rejection of evidence and (2) the verdict of the jury is flagrantly against the ■evidence.
We find no objection in the record to the admission of the evidence about which complaint is made. Nevertheless we have given consideration to the evidence complained of, and if .proper objections bad been saved to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Green v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Bradley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940