Legal Opinion

Porter v. Coco

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 2006No. 2005-715PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHlCKS, J.

The petitioners, Richard and Paula Porter, appeal the decision of the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) granting summary judgment to the respondents, Kevin and Susan Coco, on the Porters’ petition to quiet title and establish boundary line. We reverse and remand.

The record supports the following. The parties own adjacent parcels in Fremont. They dispute ownership of 2.2 acres. The record reveals that at least as far back as 1862, the Porter parcel, the disputed land, and a portion of the Coco parcel were commonly owned by the Trickeys. The Porters acquired title to their property by warranty deed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Radkay v. ConfaloneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Panciocco v. Lawyers Title InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Sorenson v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fadili v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Thomas v. Telegraph Pub. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Coco v. JaskunasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Thomas v. Telegraph Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API