Legal Opinion

Schirmer v. Nethercutt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1930No. 22180. Department TwoPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This case is an aftermath of the decision of this court in State ex rel. Schirmer v. Superior Court, 143 Wash. 578, 255 Pac. 960.

This action was brought by respondent to recover damages from appellant, an attorney at law, for breach of duty in permitting respondent to act as a witness, to a will in which respondent was named as a beneficiary. Respondent alleged that he employed appellant as an attorney to prepare the will for the grand mother of respondent. The nature of the will, its witnessing, and the effect thereof on respondent as a legatee, who had been intended by the testatrix to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hightower v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Isham v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Norman v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Jones v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Oleyar v. Kerr, TrusteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Bowman v. John DoeWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Peters v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Goodstein v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API