Legal Opinion

Calderon-Pacheco v. State Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1990No. CA A48088; SC S36346PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

In this administrative law case, we are to decide whether the Board of Parole improperly refused to consider a prisoner’s evidence of mitigating factors in setting an initial parole release date. At the hearing to consider the release date, the Board refused to admit or consider evidence that petitioner was a hard-working person who would be employable outside the walls of the corrections institution. The Board rejected the evidence on the basis that it was not “directly related to the circumstances surrounding the crime.” The Court of Appeals affirmed from the bench. Calderon-Pacheco v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Price v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Evensizer v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hein v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Howard v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Forbus v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Williford v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API