Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 1989No. CA A48953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order setting his parole release date. ORS 144.335. We affirm.

Petitioner argues that the Board erred in applying risk aggravation factors B (threat or act of violence toward victims) and C (victims were particularly vulnerable). ORS 183.482(8); see OAR 255-35-035, Exhibit E. He asserts that the Board could not apply those factors, because the facts underlying them duplicated the elements of the crimes of which he was convicted (two counts of sodomy I and one count of sodomy II). An aggravating factor that constitutes a defining element of the crime may not also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Evensizer v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boxberger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Severy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Hayes v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API