Legal Opinion

Louth v. Kaser

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1961No. 2992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

The appellee here, plaintiff below, sought to enjoin defendant-appellant from preventing plaintiff’s coming upon defendant’s land for the purpose of maintaining and repairing what is known as the Gilland Ditch and to clean out and repair the head-gate to that ditch on Lodge Pole Creek.

Plaintiff had a water right adjudicated by the State Board of Control for 3.50 cubic feet of water per second of time to be used for the irrigation of 245 acres of his lands. The waters were diverted from Lodge Pole Creek at a point on defendant’s lands and were carried across a portion of defendant’s lands…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Wyoming Hereford Ranch v. Hammond Packing Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Van Tassel Real Estate & Livestock Co. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kearney Lake, Land & Reservoir Co. v. Lake DeSmet Reservoir Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kearney Lake, Land & Reservoir Co. v. Lake DeSmet Reservoir Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wheatland Irrigation District v. Pioneer Canal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Louth v. KaserWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State by and Through Christopulos v. Husky Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API