Legal Opinion · Dissent

State by and Through Christopulos v. Husky Oil Company

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1978No. 4780Published

1DissentRaper, Justice

I join in the dissent of the Chief Justice and separately dissent, as well.

It appears to me that the majority has gone to extreme lengths to justify the remand of this case to the district court to join additional parties and carry on a full-blown trial to develop facts that are not in dispute or important at this juncture with parties either before the court or in my view unnecessary in this proceeding.

There is only one simple issue to be decided, and that was presented by the Husky Oil Company in its action for a declaratory judgment. Boiled down, it and the State are only asking the court:…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. City of Westminster v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Budd v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API