Legal Opinion
Kam Koon Wan v. E. E. Black, Limited
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1951No. 12677_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. for overtime benefits allegedly accruing to them during the six-year period preceding November 14, 1945, the date of commencement of the action. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1337.
Defendant denied that the activities for which overtime compensation was sought were within the coverage of the Act, and alleged that in any event plaintiffs had been paid time and one-half for all overtime since November 10, 1943.
Following enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- The People Of Saipan v. United States Department Of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Gideon J. Rohner, Jr. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Clifton D. Mayhew, Inc. v. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.