Legal Opinion
Heinly v. Queen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 11, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 91-6549PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*104OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with a pendant state claim in tort was originally brought by the plaintiff, Keith Heinly, against former Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Ronald M. Sharpe, Captain Robert G. Werts, and John Doe Officers Q through Z. The plaintiffs claims arise out of the Pennsylvania State Police’s response to his brother, Kevin Heinly’s murder of Deanna Renner and subsequent suicide after barricading himself in their father’s home. In particular, the plaintiff alleges that in course of these events he was struck by…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richard Berndt v. State of Tennessee and Lakeshore Mental Health InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Tysheia Garvin v. City of Philadelphia Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Shoemaker v. City of Lock HavenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cruz v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.