Legal Opinion
Cruz v. City of Camden
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 4, 1995No. Civ. 93-3567PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of Lorraine A. DiCintio, Esquire, attorney for the plaintiff, Juan Anthony Cruz, for leave pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15 to amend the complaint to add new causes of action against “John Doe” defendants and against newly named defendants. After careful consideration of the party’s submissions, and after further consideration of the oral argument conducted on the record on June 30, 1995, and for the reasons noted below, the plaintiffs motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Rolax v. WhitmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Windsor Card Shops, Inc. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Wine v. Emsa Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Provenzano v. Integrated GeneticsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.