Legal Opinion
United States v. ITT Industries, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 8, 2004No. Consol. 97-01777PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 1 moves for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56, seeking payment of a civil penalty, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. Defendant ITT Industries, Inc., d/b/a ITT Jabsco (“Jabsco”), opposes Plaintiffs motion and moves for summary judgment, asserting that because Customs improperly calculated the actual loss of antidumping duties Jabsco owed, the agency also inappropriately assessed the civil penalty. Accordingly, Jabsco seeks a refund of excess antidumping duties paid with interest,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Horizon Products International, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- United States v. Univar USA, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Consolidated Bearings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- United States v. Univar USA Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Snap-on, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.