Legal Opinion

United States v. Univar USA Inc.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 13, 2018No. Slip Op. 18-157; Court No. 15-00215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnett, Judge:

In this action, the United States of America ("Plaintiff" or the "Government") seeks to recover unpaid duties and a monetary penalty pursuant to Section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (2012),1 plus interest, costs, and attorney fees, stemming from 36 entries of saccharin, allegedly transshipped from the People's Republic of China ("China") through the Republic of China ("Taiwan"), which Univar entered into the commerce of the United States between 2007 and 2012. See generally Compl., ECF. No. 2. Before the court is Defendant, Univar USA Inc.'s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Reginald Jones v. UPS Group FreightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Cruzin Cooler, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  2. United States v. Harvic Int'l, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 2020
  3. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  4. United States v. Katana Racing, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API