Legal Opinion

Reed v. Hollister

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

It was held by this court upon the former appeal of this cause that the complaint states *413a good cause of action on the judgment. This complaint has not been amended or changed since the former appeal. The decision of this court upon this point is the law of the case.

The amended answer, which consists of affirmative allegations only, and contains no denial of any fact alleged in the complaint, admits all of the material facts alleged; and there is no allegation in the answer that the judgment has been paid. Therefore, the sole question presented upon this appeal is whether the facts alleged in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Powell v. D. S. & G. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Stager v. Troy Laundry Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Portland Trust Co. v. CoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Murphy v. City of AlbinaOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Applegate v. DowellOregon Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Matter of Estate of HurlbuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Adskim v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. May v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API