Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1932PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action at law to recover indemnity under an accident and health policy issued by the defendant company to plaintiff for an accidental injury sustained by plaintiff.

In the first answer filed by the defendant, it set up an equitable defense and prayed for the cancellation of the policy. After a hearing thereon, a decree was entered in the court below denying equitable relief and directing that the action proceed at law, which decree was affirmed by this court in 136 Or. '400 (299 P. 294).

The defense sought to be interposed on the equity side of the court was that the application made…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Powell v. D. S. & G. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Baker County v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Portland Trust Co. v. CoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Reed v. HollisterOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Adskim v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Comer v. World Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API