Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Albina

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Multnomah county: E. D. Shattuck., Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an action to recover on a quantum meruit for work and labor alleged to have been performed by plaintiff, in grading, cutting, and filling one of defendant’s streets, known as Margaretta avenue. This is the second appeal in this case. For the purposes of this appeal, the facts sufficiently appear in the case as reported (20 Or. 379), except from this record it appears that plaintiff by his written contract was to grade Margaretta avenue, a public street of the defendant, to the grade established by the city, as surveyed and established by Hulbert & McQuinn, and according to a profile…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Bonesteel v. . the Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. McCortle v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Rens v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Webster v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Hjelle v. BakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Reed v. HollisterOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Taggart v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API