Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Adskim v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

Questions of law which have arisen and been decided upon a former appeal become the law of the case so far as applicable to the facts developed on the second trial. Reed v. Hollister, 106 Or. 407 (212 P. 367); Douglas v. Rumelin, 130 Or. 375, 377 (280 P. 329); Bloech v. Hyland Homes Co., 128 Or. 292, 299 (274 P. 318); Hostetler v. Eccles, 112 Or. 572, 578-9 (230 P. 549).

In addition to the testimony adduced by plaintiff in the former trial he introduced the deposition of J. R. Livingston, who was night operator in the employ of defendant at Hilgard at the time of the accident. Mr. Livingston…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Leonard v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Morrison v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Conachan v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Shaw v. Pacific Supply CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. SackOregon Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API