Legal Opinion

Barfield v. City of La Porte

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1993No. 6-92-069-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

William Barfield appeals from an adverse summary judgment. Barfield sued the City of La Porte under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 8307c (Vernon Supp.1993), which provides a cause of action for employees who are discharged in retaliation for making workers’ compensation claims.

The City of La Porte employed Barfield as a paint-and-body repairman in the City’s maintenance garage. In 1983, Barfield was injured and hospitalized. He filed a claim with the State’s Industrial Accident Board. About two months after the accident, he returned to work but was restricted to lifting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. De Gonzalez v. Mission American Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of West Lake Hills v. Westwood Legal Defense FundCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Wallace v. City of Midland, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Chesser v. LifeCare Management Services, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. City of La Porte v. Prince, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
  4. Boenig v. Starnair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. Classen v. Irving Healthcare System, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API