Legal Opinion

Classen v. Irving Healthcare System

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 25, 1993No. 05-92-01956-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Carol Classen appeals a take nothing summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of Irving Healthcare System (IHS). In four points of error, Classen asserts that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment because: (1) article 8307c of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act was specifically adopted for and applies to political subdivisions and is enforceable against IHS, (2) the affidavit of Sally D. Hill in support of IHS’s motion for summary judgment was inadmissible summary judgment evidence, and (3) she raised fact issues in her affidavit that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Grotjohn Precise Connexiones International, S.A. v. JEM Financial, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. H & C Communications, Inc. v. Reed's Food International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Classen v. Irving Healthcare SystemTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jorden v. Ensign-Bickford Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API