Legal Opinion

Bylers Alaska Wilderness Adventures Inc. v. City of Kodiak

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2008No. S-12343PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A judge initially assigned to a case granted a motion in limine which precluded several aspects of the plaintiff's past from being introduced at trial. Due to scheduling conflicts, the trial was reassigned to a judge who declined to follow the prior ruling and admitted much of the previously disallowed evidence. Because the evidentiary rulings were within the discretion of the court and, in any event, the disputed evidence was not disposi-tive of the jury's ultimate finding, we affirm.

II FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

Darren Byler (Byler) 1 and his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stepanov v. GavrilovichAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dobos v. IngersollAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. West v. BuchananAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Walker v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ray v. DraegerAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Kingery v. BarrettAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API