Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1959No. 6720Published

1DissentJohnson, Justice

I disagree with the majority opinion.

A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 8, Article 2, entitled Eminent Domain, is taken substantially verbatim from California, Viliborghi v. Prescott School Dist. No. 1, 55 Ariz. 230, 100 P.2d 178, and we have repeatedly held that where a statute is adopted almost verbatim from another state we will either adopt the construction given it where it originated or look to such construction as of persuasive force if it is sound or reasonable. Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power Dist., 49 Ariz. 531, 68 P.2d 329; Arizona State Tax Comm. v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light &…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. HilvertArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. DennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Viliborghi v. Prescott School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Oregon Elec. Ry. Co. v. Terwilliger Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API