Legal Opinion

Atlantic National Insurance v. Armstrong

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1966No. L. A. 27804PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Defendants and cross-complainants appeal from a declaratory judgment for plaintiff and cross-defendants in an action to determine the rights of the parties under an insurance policy. The primary issue is whether an insurer is permitted to exclude from a motor vehicle liability policy coverage for injuries sustained by occupants of the insured automobile. We have concluded that such an exclusion is contrary to the public policy set forth in Wildman v. Government Employees’ Ins. Co. (1957) 48 Cal.2d 31 [307 P.2d 359], and that plaintiff is obligated under the policy to satisfy any judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API