Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Xerox Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1990No. 00171PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Cynthia McCullough and Michael McCullough, her husband, filed a complaint in trespass on January 10, 1983 against appellee Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”). As stated by the trial court:

Plaintiff [Cynthia McCullough] commenced employment with the Defendant in August of 1979 as a technical representative. Her duties included repairing and cleaning photo copy machines using various chemicals. Plaintiff continued her employment until January of 1981 when she claimed she could no longer work. On or about December 7, 1981, she returned to work for the Defendant and commenced training to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Poyser v. Newman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Greer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grant v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Capobianchi v. Bic Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Phillips v. A.P. Green Refractories Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API