Legal Opinion

Rue v. K-Mart Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

In this appeal before the court en banc, we are presented with, inter alia, the heretofore unsettled question of whether issue preclusion, i.e., collateral estoppel, applies to findings made in an unemployment compensation hearing. Upon review, we find that determinations of an unemployment compensation referee and the unemployment compensation *644board of review do not merit the application of collateral estoppel.

• The public policy underlying the Unemployment Compensation Law mandates that we do not adopt a position which would slow the unemployment compensation process and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Harmon v. Mifflin County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Dice v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Bakare v. Pinnacle Health Hospitals, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API