Legal Opinion

Lyon v. Pittsburgh, Allegheny & Manchester Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1933No. Appeals, 221 and 222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

November 27, 1933:

Upon a judgment recovered by him against the Pittsburgh, Allegheny & Manchester Traction Company, hereinafter called the Manchester Traction Company, plaintiff issued an attachment sur judgment, summoning the United Traction Company of Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh Railways Company, as garnishees. Interrogatories were filed, and the garnishees’ answers thereto were held sufficient to defeat plaintiff’s rule for judgment upon them. Subsequently, and without discontinuing the prior writ, a second attachment sur judgment was issued against the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ottman v. Nixon-NirdlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Frazier v. BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Keller v. N. J. Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Branch v. KaiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Oil City N. Bk., Exr. v. McCalmont, Exr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allegany Gas Co. v. KempSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Timlin v. Scranton (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. In re Reorganization of Pittsburgh Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Keystone Trust Co. v. Aaronson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API