Legal Opinion

Van Core v. Bodner

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1947No. Civ. 3451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff brought this simple action to quiet title against defendant. Defendant answered, and by way of cross-complaint set forth his claimed interest in the property and also sought the recovery of $700 for funds claimed to have been advanced by him to plaintiff.

Plaintiff William Van Core, aged 68, and his wife, Margaret R. Van Core, aged 63 in October, 1931, acquired a 2%-acre tract of land in Fontana on that date. It was held in joint tenancy and was improved with a small dwelling, chicken equipment, and a few fruit trees. Within a year from the date of purchase, defendant Andrew J.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. De Mattos v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Cooper v. PenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Roy v. PosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Bank of America v. FrostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Hodges v. LochheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Windiate v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. San Filippo v. VitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API