Legal Opinion

Roy v. Pos

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1920No. S. F. No. 8642PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George E. Crothers, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The plaintiff in this action sought to enforce a written agreement to devise property. The appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon the failure of the plaintiff to amend her complaint within the time granted for that purpose by an order sustaining the demurrers of the defendants.

The facts alleged by the complaint are substantially these: In October, 1914, Constance Roy was a widow about eighty-one years of age, having no living brother, sister, or parent, and without child or other issue; the only person in the United States in any way related to her was the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Howe v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Estate of RollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Bleecher v. ConteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API