Legal Opinion

Starbucks Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2008No. G039700PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Petitioner Starbucks Corporation (Starbucks) petitions for a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order denying Starbucks’s motion for summary judgment, and to enter a new order granting the motion.

Real parties in interest Erik Lords, Hon Yeung, and Donald Brown (collectively plaintiffs) represent a class of some 135,000 unsuccessful job applicants at Starbucks. They allege that the Starbucks employment application contains an “illegal question” about prior marijuana convictions that are more than two years old. They seek statutory damages of $200 per…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Huff v. Securitas Sec. Servs. United States, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Broberg v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Doe v. Lincoln Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Kraft Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API