Legal Opinion
Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 2000No. 99-16713PublishedCited by 470 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to decide whether the named plaintiffs in a Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., collective action may, in the caption of their complaint, use pseudonyms in place of their true names. Plaintiffs in this case are foreign garment workers on the island of Saipan. They used fictitious names in their complaint because they fear that, if their identities are disclosed to defendants and other nonparties to this action, they will be fired from their jobs, deported from Saipan, and arrested and imprisoned by the People’s Republic of China.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by470 opinions
- Sealed v. Sealed 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Company Doe v. Public CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
465 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.